The Travels of Shaykh Ahmad al-Alawi 1905-1930

The period between 1910 and 1923 remains one of the most difficult to reconstruct. Yet an increasing number of chronological markers can now be established: Tlemcen in 1912, the Tunisian Sahel in 1915, Tlemcen in the account of the Lutfiyya around 1915–1916, Tunisia in 1918, Tlemcen and Kabylia in 1919, Mascara in 1920 and 1922, followed by movements in Oranie and the presence at Oujda in 1923. The gaps that remain between these dates do not mean that the Shaykh was not travelling; they indicate only that not all the documents needed to reconstruct these movements have yet been found.

The period between 1910 and 1923 is particularly difficult to reconstruct. It is nevertheless now possible to identify several secure or strongly attested points: Tlemcen in 1912, the Tunisian Sahel in 1915, a photographically attested presence in Tlemcen in 1919, Kabylia in the same year, Mascara in 1920 and 1922, and then a journey through western Algeria at the end of 1923. The details of his activities and movements between these dates remain poorly known. This gap is all the more striking because letters, testimonies and the press simultaneously reveal a very rapid expansion of his teaching and networks.

I have chosen not to fill these gaps artificially. When a journey or visit is attested by direct evidence, I present it as such. When a movement appears probable but its date or itinerary remains uncertain, I state this explicitly. Finally, when a late source or an oral testimony provides an isolated clue, I retain it as a line of enquiry without assigning it the same evidential weight as a dated letter or a contemporary press report.

In this study, the word ‘journey’ refers to movements whose itinerary becomes extensive, whose stages multiply, or whose spiritual, intellectual or transmission-related purpose is clear. A movement limited to a single town, attendance at a gathering, or the inspection of a zāwiya is described as a ‘visit’ or ‘movement’. Likewise, the dispatch of a muqaddam or disciple to a country does not, by itself, constitute evidence that the Shaykh travelled there personally.

To assess the degree of attestation, the sources have been ranked hierarchically: a direct contemporary source takes precedence over a later account; a dated letter or newspaper article specifying place and time carries greater weight than an isolated oral testimony. When the day or month is unknown, no precision absent from the source is introduced. Certain stages are therefore described as ‘attested’, ‘strongly probable’ or ‘unresolved’.

Derwîsh al-‘Alâwî

Available on Amazon